Measuring America’s Governance
- U.S.: #28 of 35 developed democracies in Voter participation. (OECD)
- Worse than All European & Nordic Countries – plus Israel, Tunisia. (International Democracy Index)
Metric for Elections Legitimacy
Calculate the “ Electoral Mass ” — % support from the Electorate
What % of the Voter-Eligible Population (VEP) backs the winning candidate? Margins?
Note – VEP far overstates participation: Only ~60% of Age 18+ adults register (VEP = ~0.60 x VAP)
Primaries
Nominees “win” ~8%, by ~2% margins. Winner gets 1-in-12 voters, 1-in-35 margin.
- Virtually no electoral mass — still lower in caucuses.
- Partisan “true believer” factions, ideological, single-issues.
- Fewer moderate “normal people” with diverse issue views.
General
Candidates “win” with ~25%, by ~4% margins. Winner gets 1-in-4 voters, 1-in-25 margin.
- Winners “lose” ±75% of the electorate.
- Hobson’s choice, take one or the other.
- Both beholden to Party issue positions, plutocrats.
Democracy Death Spiral
Two-Party Negative Feedback Loops
- ↓Fewer voters => ↑Factional candidates => ↓Fewer voters.
- ↑Factional Candidates => ↑Polarizing campaigns =>
- ↓Fewer voters => ↑Factional governance.
- ↑Factional governance => ↑Gridlock =>
- ↓Governmentdysfunction => ↑Unmet National Needs
- ==> Collapsed political mechanics
2016 Presidential
58% turnout (Gallup 2016)
Winner got only 27% “Electoral Mass.”
- 46% of vote, on 58% turnout (0.46 x 0.58 = 0.27)
- Only 72% of vote was “For” — 28% was “Against” opponent.
- Net “Base” support = 19% (0.78 x 0.27 = 0.19) (CBS Exit poll).
Two most disfavored, double-digit negative candidates in 70 yrs.
- (Net-negative) unfavorability: R ‒25% & D ‒18%.
- Only one candidate ever net-negative (Goldwater ’64)
- 20% of vote was “Lesser Evil” — 1-in-5 disfavored both.
- Election swung on that “Least-Worst” split : R-Winner beat D-Loser as “Least Worst” by +17% (47-30%).
Other Data Points
“Electoral Mass” in recent elections
2017 Virginia State-wide — 3 offices ~~ only 48% turnout.
- Primaries – Win margins: 1.1% | 0.9% | 0.2%.
- Winning “Electoral Mass”: 25.6% | 24.8% | 25.1%.General – Winning margins: 4.2% | 3.1% | 2.1%.
2017 Alabama U.S. Senate ~ only 40% turnout.
- Primaries — Win “Mass”: 3.3%, 7.8%, margins 0.3%, 0.5%
- General Election – Win “Mass”: 20%, margin, 0.007%.
- “Both major political parties are viewed unfavorably by more than half of Alabama voters.” (CBS exit poll)
2018 Arizona 8th District Special ~~ only 38% turnout.
- Primaries – Winning “Mass”: D-4.8%, R-5.6%.
- General Election – Winning” Mass: 20.1%, margin, 2.0%.